Keyword: handhaving

Gemeentelijke grip op private sensorgegevens: Juridisch kader voor het gemeentelijke handelingsperspectief bij de verwerking van private sensorgegevens in de openbare ruimte download

Janssen, H., Verboeket, L.W., Meiring, A., van Hoboken, J., van Eechoud, M., van den Brink, J.E., Ortlep, R. & Bodó, B.
2023

handhaving, Privacy, sensoren, Surveillance

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Gemeentelijke grip op private sensorgegevens: Juridisch kader voor het gemeentelijke handelingsperspectief bij de verwerking van private sensorgegevens in de openbare ruimte}, author = {Janssen, H. and Verboeket, L.W. and Meiring, A. and van Hoboken, J. and van Eechoud, M. and van den Brink, J.E. and Ortlep, R. and Bodó, B.}, url = {https://dev.ivir.nl/publications/gemeentelijke-grip-op-private-sensorgegevens-juridisch-kader-voor-het-gemeentelijke-handelingsperspectief-bij-de-verwerking-van-private-sensorgegevens-in-de-openbare-ruimte/gemeentelijke_grip_op_private_sensorgegevens/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-06-30}, keywords = {handhaving, Privacy, sensoren, Surveillance}, }

Crosshatching Privacy: Financial Intermediaries’ Data Practices Between Law Enforcement and Data Economy external link

Ferrari, V.
European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 6, num: 4, pp: 522-535, 2020

Abstract

Financial data are key to various law enforcement processes, including criminal investigations, anti-money laundering strategies and the implementation of national fiscal policies. However, financial data also qualify as personal data. While law enforcement objectives can derogate certain privacy-related legal safeguards, private financial firms should, in principle, comply with the privacy standards upheld by GDPR. Highlighting the most critical trends of the current financial industry (i.e. commercial exploitation of data; international dimension of financial informational networks; use of automated processing and decision-making tools), the present paper analyses how privacy and law enforcement priorities interplay in determining the governance of financial data. We conclude by recognizing that privacy loopholes exist in the current financial industry’s data practices, and that - as payments tend to be increasingly performed in digital manners, exponentially increasing the availability of financial data - privacy-enhancing payment methods should be encouraged and legitimised.

financiele dienstverlening, handhaving, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Ferrari2020b, title = {Crosshatching Privacy: Financial Intermediaries’ Data Practices Between Law Enforcement and Data Economy}, author = {Ferrari, V.}, url = {https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2020/4/8 https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/edpl_2020_04.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/4/8}, year = {1222}, date = {2020-12-22}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, volume = {6}, number = {4}, pages = {522-535}, abstract = {Financial data are key to various law enforcement processes, including criminal investigations, anti-money laundering strategies and the implementation of national fiscal policies. However, financial data also qualify as personal data. While law enforcement objectives can derogate certain privacy-related legal safeguards, private financial firms should, in principle, comply with the privacy standards upheld by GDPR. Highlighting the most critical trends of the current financial industry (i.e. commercial exploitation of data; international dimension of financial informational networks; use of automated processing and decision-making tools), the present paper analyses how privacy and law enforcement priorities interplay in determining the governance of financial data. We conclude by recognizing that privacy loopholes exist in the current financial industry’s data practices, and that - as payments tend to be increasingly performed in digital manners, exponentially increasing the availability of financial data - privacy-enhancing payment methods should be encouraged and legitimised.}, keywords = {financiele dienstverlening, handhaving, Privacy}, }

Belgian court asks CJEU whether seeding is communicating to the public external link

Bouchè, G.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2020

aansprakelijkheid, Belgium, Copyright, EU, frontpage, handhaving, right of communication to the public

Bibtex

Article{Bouchè2020b, title = {Belgian court asks CJEU whether seeding is communicating to the public}, author = {Bouchè, G.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/03/30/belgian-court-asks-cjeu-whether-seeding-is-communicating-to-the-public/}, year = {0330}, date = {2020-03-30}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {aansprakelijkheid, Belgium, Copyright, EU, frontpage, handhaving, right of communication to the public}, }

Privatised enforcement and the right to freedom of expression in a world confronted with terrorism propaganda online external link

Coche, E.
Internet Policy Review, vol. 2018, num: 4, 2018

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the risks of privatised enforcement in the field of terrorism propaganda, stemming from the EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. By shedding light on this Code, the author argues that implementation of it may undermine the rule of law and give rise to private censorship. In order to outweigh these risks, IT companies should improve their transparency, especially towards users whose content have been affected. Where automated means are used, the companies should always have in place some form of human intervention in order to contextualise posts. At the EU level, the Commission should provide IT companies with clearer guidelines regarding their liability exemption under the e-Commerce Directive. This would help prevent a race-to-the bottom where intermediaries choose to interpret and apply the most stringent national laws in order to secure at utmost their liability. The paper further articulates on the fine line that exists between ‘terrorist content’ and ‘illegal hate speech’ and the need for more detailed definitions.

code of conduct, frontpage, handhaving, hate speech, terrorisme, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{Coche2018g, title = {Privatised enforcement and the right to freedom of expression in a world confronted with terrorism propaganda online}, author = {Coche, E.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/privatised-enforcement-and-right-freedom-expression-world-confronted-terrorism}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.14763/2018.4.1382}, year = {1106}, date = {2018-11-06}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, volume = {2018}, number = {4}, pages = {}, abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to explore the risks of privatised enforcement in the field of terrorism propaganda, stemming from the EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. By shedding light on this Code, the author argues that implementation of it may undermine the rule of law and give rise to private censorship. In order to outweigh these risks, IT companies should improve their transparency, especially towards users whose content have been affected. Where automated means are used, the companies should always have in place some form of human intervention in order to contextualise posts. At the EU level, the Commission should provide IT companies with clearer guidelines regarding their liability exemption under the e-Commerce Directive. This would help prevent a race-to-the bottom where intermediaries choose to interpret and apply the most stringent national laws in order to secure at utmost their liability. The paper further articulates on the fine line that exists between ‘terrorist content’ and ‘illegal hate speech’ and the need for more detailed definitions.}, keywords = {code of conduct, frontpage, handhaving, hate speech, terrorisme, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation external link

Hins, A., Hugenholtz, P., McGonagle, T., van Daalen, O., van Hoboken, J., Angelopoulos, C., Brody, A. & Margoni, T.
2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, handhaving, zelfregulering

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation}, author = {Hins, A. and Hugenholtz, P. and McGonagle, T. and van Daalen, O. and van Hoboken, J. and Angelopoulos, C. and Brody, A. and Margoni, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/study_fundamental_rights_limitations.pdf}, year = {0616}, date = {2016-06-16}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, handhaving, zelfregulering}, }