The independence and functioning of the regulatory authority for electronic media in Serbia, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Belgrade, 2017. external link

Irion, K., Ledger, M. & Svensson, S.
2017

Abstract

This study carries out an independent assessment of the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media (REM) of Serbia. The scope of the study is to apply the INDIREG methodology to the REM and provide contextual interpretation of the results with policy recommendations. This study has been commissioned by the Council of Europe, on the request of REM, in the framework of the Project “Reinforcing Judicial Expertise on Freedom of Expression and the Media in South-East Europe (JUFREX)”. REM, seated in Belgrade, is caught and operates in a challenging context: media markets in Serbia are highly saturated and government grants are awarded to selective private media. There is low upfront compliance with programme and advertisements rules as well as an overall squeeze on quality content and the accountability function of the media. Lacking the optimal support of the parliament and being sidelined by the Ministry on Culture and Information can damage the effective functioning of the independent regulator. REM in this situation appears to retreat to overly formalistic (law-abiding) activities without necessarily being effective in regulating the Serbian electronic and audiovisual media. Many stakeholders from the media sector do not perceive of REM as an authority pointing to a lack of enforcement or the deflection of responsibility which has undermined its public credibility. The study concludes with a set of recommendation how to address these challenges.

AVMS Directive, frontpage, independence, INDIREG, media, Regulation

Bibtex

Other{Irion2017d, title = {The independence and functioning of the regulatory authority for electronic media in Serbia, Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Belgrade, 2017.}, author = {Irion, K. and Ledger, M. and Svensson, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/rem-report-indiregmethodology-nov17-final-3/}, year = {1016}, date = {2017-10-16}, abstract = {This study carries out an independent assessment of the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media (REM) of Serbia. The scope of the study is to apply the INDIREG methodology to the REM and provide contextual interpretation of the results with policy recommendations. This study has been commissioned by the Council of Europe, on the request of REM, in the framework of the Project “Reinforcing Judicial Expertise on Freedom of Expression and the Media in South-East Europe (JUFREX)”. REM, seated in Belgrade, is caught and operates in a challenging context: media markets in Serbia are highly saturated and government grants are awarded to selective private media. There is low upfront compliance with programme and advertisements rules as well as an overall squeeze on quality content and the accountability function of the media. Lacking the optimal support of the parliament and being sidelined by the Ministry on Culture and Information can damage the effective functioning of the independent regulator. REM in this situation appears to retreat to overly formalistic (law-abiding) activities without necessarily being effective in regulating the Serbian electronic and audiovisual media. Many stakeholders from the media sector do not perceive of REM as an authority pointing to a lack of enforcement or the deflection of responsibility which has undermined its public credibility. The study concludes with a set of recommendation how to address these challenges.}, keywords = {AVMS Directive, frontpage, independence, INDIREG, media, Regulation}, }

Een uitgeversrecht voor pluriforme media? external link

AMI, num: 6, pp: 16-23, 2017

Abstract

Volgens de Europese Commissie hebben we een nieuw intellectueel eigendomsrecht nodig op perspublicaties. Dit artikel neemt het belangrijkste argument voor de introductie van zo’n recht kritisch onder de loep: dat het zal bijdragen aan een pluriforme kwaliteitspers. Daarnaast werpt het een blik op de effecten die het nieuwe recht heeft op de positie van makers, met name freelance journalisten en andere auteurs. De conclusie is dat dit onderdeel van de geplande Richtlijn Auteursrecht in de digitale eengemaakte markt (‘DSM-richtlijn’) terug moet naar de tekentafel, of liever nog de prullenbak in.

frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom, Journalistiek, media, pers, uitgeversrecht

Bibtex

Article{vanEechoud2017b, title = {Een uitgeversrecht voor pluriforme media?}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2016_6.pdf}, year = {0425}, date = {2017-04-25}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, abstract = {Volgens de Europese Commissie hebben we een nieuw intellectueel eigendomsrecht nodig op perspublicaties. Dit artikel neemt het belangrijkste argument voor de introductie van zo’n recht kritisch onder de loep: dat het zal bijdragen aan een pluriforme kwaliteitspers. Daarnaast werpt het een blik op de effecten die het nieuwe recht heeft op de positie van makers, met name freelance journalisten en andere auteurs. De conclusie is dat dit onderdeel van de geplande Richtlijn Auteursrecht in de digitale eengemaakte markt (‘DSM-richtlijn’) terug moet naar de tekentafel, of liever nog de prullenbak in.}, keywords = {frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom, Journalistiek, media, pers, uitgeversrecht}, }

Kroniek Mediarecht external link

KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, vol. 140, pp: 8150-8152, 2016

bibliotheken, bronbescherming, e-lending, media, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Breemen2016b, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, V.}, year = {0901}, date = {2016-09-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {140}, pages = {8150-8152}, keywords = {bibliotheken, bronbescherming, e-lending, media, Privacy}, }

Kroniek Mediarecht external link

KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, vol. 139, pp: 8075-8077, 2016

aansprakelijkheid internetplatform, censuur, google spain, klokkenluiders, media, mediawet, publieke omroep, reclame, right to be forgotten, toezicht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{Breemen2016b, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, V.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/kwartaalsignaal-139-mediarecht.pdf}, year = {0601}, date = {2016-06-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {139}, pages = {8075-8077}, keywords = {aansprakelijkheid internetplatform, censuur, google spain, klokkenluiders, media, mediawet, publieke omroep, reclame, right to be forgotten, toezicht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }