Auteursrecht, frontpage, YouTube
Article{nokey,
title = {YouTube Copyright Transparency Report: Overblocking is real},
author = {Keller, P.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/12/09/youtube-copyright-transparency-report-overblocking-is-real/},
year = {1210},
date = {2021-12-10},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, YouTube},
} communication to the public, Copyright, duitsland, frontpage, YouTube
Article{Mil2019b,
title = {German Federal Court of Justice asks CJEU if YouTube is directly liable for user-uploaded content},
author = {Mil and J. van},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz034},
year = {0507},
date = {2019-05-07},
journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice },
volume = {14},
number = {5},
pages = {355-356},
abstract = {On 13 September 2018, the German Federal Court of Justice referred preliminary questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union, including the question whether YouTube performs acts of communication to the public when its users upload unauthorized content onto this platform.},
keywords = {communication to the public, Copyright, duitsland, frontpage, YouTube},
} Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, Mediarecht, YouTube
Article{Dommering2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 1 december 2015 (Cengiz e.a. / Turkije)},
author = {Dommering, E.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_337.pdf},
year = {0913},
date = {2016-09-13},
journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
number = {36},
abstract = {De vrijheid om inlichtingen of denkbeelden te ontvangen of te verstrekken. Blokkering toegang (video)website YouTube. Onvoldoende wetttelijke basis. Schending art. 10 EVRM.},
keywords = {Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, Mediarecht, YouTube},
}